<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Already Part of the Constitution!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fortysouth.com/2008/12/14/its-already-part-of-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fortysouth.com/2008/12/14/its-already-part-of-the-constitution/</link>
	<description>On Technology and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenya Communications (Amendment) Act 2008: Now What? &#171; fortySouth</title>
		<link>http://fortysouth.com/2008/12/14/its-already-part-of-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenya Communications (Amendment) Act 2008: Now What? &#171; fortySouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortysouth.com/?p=300#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] This Act (2008) now contains debatable sections, most notably Section 88, which I previously discussed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This Act (2008) now contains debatable sections, most notably Section 88, which I previously discussed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC(A) Bill + ICT Bill, 2008 [Updated] &#171; fortySouth</title>
		<link>http://fortysouth.com/2008/12/14/its-already-part-of-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>KC(A) Bill + ICT Bill, 2008 [Updated] &#171; fortySouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortysouth.com/?p=300#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] read about why I think many people might not have read the entire KC(A) Bill. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)GM Consolidates And Campbell-Ewald Loses A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read about why I think many people might not have read the entire KC(A) Bill. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)GM Consolidates And Campbell-Ewald Loses A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
